Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-04-21 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-04-21 House Journal Page 1409 HB 54 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 54 "An Act relating to eavesdropping, telephone caller identification, and telephone directory listings and solicitations." with the: Journal Page L&C RPT CS(L&C) NEW TITLE 6DP 678 -ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DCED) 3/17/93 678 JUD RPT CS(L&C) NEW TITLE 4DP 2NR 955 -PREVIOUS ZERO FN (DCED) 3/17/93 956 FIN RPT CS(L&C) NEW TITLE 5DP 2NR 1171 -PREVIOUS ZERO FN (DCED) 3/17/93 1171 Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 54(L&C) "An Act relating to telephone caller identification; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 54(L&C) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 54(L&C) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 54(L&C) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-21 House Journal Page 1410 HB 54 CSHB 54(L&C) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 39 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hoffman, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Menard, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Toohey, Ulmer, Vezey, Williams, Willis Absent: Therriault Phillips changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Vezey changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Brice changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Nicholia changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Hoffman changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Foster changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Navarre changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Olberg changed from "Nay" to "Yea". Moses changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, CSHB 54(L&C) passed the House. Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Vezey gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on CSHB 54(L&C).